Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Practice Exam

If the normal variation in a process is low, how often should monitoring be conducted?

1. Less frequent monitoring

2. More frequent monitoring

3. Daily monitoring

4. Only at the end of production

The correct answer is: Less frequent monitoring

When the normal variation in a process is low, it indicates that the process is stable and operates within a narrow range of acceptable parameters. In such cases, less frequent monitoring is sufficient because the likelihood of significant deviations from established processes is minimal. Low normal variation suggests that the process is under control and that major fluctuations or issues are unlikely to arise. Therefore, conducting monitoring less frequently is an efficient approach, allowing for resources to be allocated more effectively while still ensuring that quality assurance is met. In contrast, more frequent monitoring would be unnecessary and could lead to overregulation of the process. Daily monitoring might impose undue burden on resources if the process has demonstrated its stability over time. Monitoring only at the end of production neglects opportunities for ongoing evaluation throughout the production process, which could be crucial if unexpected variations occur. Thus, when the normal variation is low, less frequent monitoring becomes a practical and effective strategy for maintaining control over the process.