Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Practice Exam

What should be done if there is a high history of deviation in a critical control point?

1. No need for increased monitoring

2. Less frequent monitoring

3. More frequent monitoring

4. Change the monitoring criteria

The correct answer is: More frequent monitoring

If there is a high history of deviation at a critical control point, implementing more frequent monitoring is essential. Increased monitoring allows for timely identification of any deviations and ensures that corrective actions can be applied quickly. This proactive approach helps maintain food safety and quality by minimizing the risk of potential hazards. Monitoring frequency is particularly crucial in areas where past data indicates a strong likelihood of deviation, as it reinforces the overall effectiveness of the HACCP plan. By intensifying monitoring efforts, organizations can track performance closely and respond rapidly to any issues, thereby protecting public health and adhering to regulatory standards. The other options do not adequately address the risks associated with high deviation rates. For example, maintaining the current level of monitoring or reducing its frequency can lead to undetected problems, potentially compromising safety. Changing monitoring criteria might not effectively solve the underlying issue without first addressing the existing deviations. Therefore, increasing monitoring frequency is the most appropriate response in such situations.